Re: dumbass grunt mcdonnell stuck between horse and cow (Re: nut

Nigel Brooks wrote:

> <lakck3ot@nospam.net> wrote in message news:IOLMj.9762$gT3.5905@trndny02...
> 
>>
>>In <8v2dnVQNUZpSGZ7VnZ2dnUVZ_oesnz2d@toastnet>, on 04/14/2008
>>  at 09:22 AM, "Dr. James West, Ph.D." <nada@nobull.com> said:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Nigel Brooks wrote:
>>
>>>>T   I   L   T
>>
>>>Son, you're an obsessive little shithead...mentally disturbed, and unable
>>>to directly address the issue.
>>
>>>fetch that, sissyboy
>>>;-)
>>
>>
>>Yup.  They refuse to address the points, because they are wrong and they
>>know it.
>>
>>The fact is certain units were at DEFCON 1 and the deception was so good,
>>that ever today no enemy has an accurate picture of what DEFCON 1
>>preparations look like. The most important point when you are looking at
>>nuclear war.  And by the same token sending the army out with full gear
>>and no ammo, and calling it DEFCON 2, doesn't even give the enemy an
>>accurate view of what DEFCON 2 in the army looks like.
>>
>>...and the right wingers here are so dumb, they could not even be a good
>>enemy.  Its why I call them dumbass grunts.  Because its true. They prove
>>it all the time.
>>
> 
> 
> 
> Actually Eddie Letourneau the fact is that NO units were at Defcon-1 during 
> the Cuban Missile Crisis.  The highest alert status ever achieved during 
> that period by any unit of the United States Armed Forces was Defcon-2.
> 
> You are directed to the references previously given.
> 
> If you have any credible and verifiable information (other than your 
> uninformed amateur opinion), kindly post the same.

Son, by definition, DEFCON 1 is "maximum readiness", DEFCON 2 is "less than maximum readiness".

You are naive to believe we were eyeball to eyeball in a nuclear war
confrontation with *every* military unit at "less than maximum readiness".

ya fuckin sissyboy moron
;-)


fetch, because I own you, son.