"William Black" <william.black@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:fufkss$2s0$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>
> "J A" <ae@re.com> wrote in message
> news:JtudnZU5rpQZyZbVnZ2dnUVZ_sOrnZ2d@earthlink.com...
>>
>> "William Black" <william.black@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:fuf9g0$m1o$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>
>>> "J A" <ae@re.com> wrote in message
>>> news:hsudnSyzQIaBFJfVnZ2dnUVZ_rWtnZ2d@earthlink.com...
>>>>
>>>> "William Black" <william.black@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>> news:fue0rt$deq$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>>>
>>>>> "J A" <ae@re.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:w_CdnWDZ75s06pfVnZ2dnUVZ_qWtnZ2d@earthlink.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> As for terrorists, the next go around (War of 1812) was largely about
>>>>>> the Crown instigating Indian tribes to murder American settlers'
>>>>>> families.
>>>>>
>>>>> And here was me thinking it was all a nasty US plot to steal Canada
>>>>> while the British were busy saving the world from the tyranny of
>>>>> Napoleon.
>>>>
>>>> As usual, you got it ass backwards.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You mean Nappy was trying to save the world from Perfidious Albion?
>>
>> You're admitting Britain encouraged the tribes to commit terrorism
>> against American settlers on the frontier.
>
> It wasn't called 'terrorism' then. You're using modern terms and modern
> morality on an event far away in history.
>
>> If there had been any serous plans to do that, they would have had the US
>> military in a state of readiness instead of neglect, going into the War
>> of 1812.
>
> Well no.
>
> The 'war party' was also against the expansion of the US military.
>
> It's an odd thing but the infant US Navy discovered that if people were
> 'for' the war they'd also be for the contraction of the US Navy...
>
> What, of course, you are quite wilfully forgetting is that Britain was
> fully engaged in fighting what today would be considered a world war, and
> what the US was doing was a cynical land grab while the 'cat' was
> otherwise occupied.
>
> Do you honestly think the British government would start a war with the
> USA when fully engaged on the European continent?
>
> Do you honestly think that a British Empire, and the largest and most
> powerful navy in the world, with nothing else on its mind would be
> troubled by a small power on the fringes of civilisation?
>
> --
> William Black
>
>
> I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
> Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
> I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
> All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach
> Time for tea.
>
>
Well they were "troubled" enough to send an expeditionary force to the Cape
of Good Hope to invade and takeover an insignificant Dutch colony.
Roger
|